Date: 7 August 2018 22:11 (UTC)
I doubt it. He did it to many women btw, to the point that one might wonder how many ideas came out of his own head. And he was very self-aware about his place in art (in contrast to Pollock and Rothko who were not). So he should have donated all his millions to charity orgs! What bemuses me though is why nobody ever offered real criticism, no real insights into AW's art4market activities. Even art critics merely talk about colour saturation or some such throwing clever terms about his pics that if one has eyes could hardly be applied to the subject.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

python_regius: (Default)
python_regius

March 2023

M T W T F S S
  12345
6 789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 25th, 2025 02:18
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios