I doubt it. He did it to many women btw, to the point that one might wonder how many ideas came out of his own head. And he was very self-aware about his place in art (in contrast to Pollock and Rothko who were not). So he should have donated all his millions to charity orgs! What bemuses me though is why nobody ever offered real criticism, no real insights into AW's art4market activities. Even art critics merely talk about colour saturation or some such throwing clever terms about his pics that if one has eyes could hardly be applied to the subject.
no subject